I was having a discussion a few weeks ago with a family
member and as often happens with me the conversation turned towards sex. For whatever reason this happened, I was
surprised to learn this particular persons views on monogamy and how he feels
that humans were not designed to be monogamous creatures. I wholeheartedly agreed and we started
discussing our dear examples in the animal kingdom. He was surprised to learn how much research
has been done to prove conclusively that very few previously suspected animals
actually formed lifelong pair bonds. For
the most part living as a monogamous couple actually hinders an animals
potential to survive and reproduce. The
chances of procreation are significantly higher with multiple partners and
numerous matings.
Then we have the example of the ducks, ducks make terrible
lovers. In fact, ducks routinely exhibit actual forceful mating rituals that
would be characteristically referred to as rape, sometimes even gang
bangs. Yes it is true that the male of
the species forces themselves onto the female in order to reproduce. The males are not choosy, rather
opportunistic and forceful. Mother
nature is clever though, and the female, although weak in comparison to the
male has a little trick up her skirt. The
drakes penis is in the shape of a corkscrew.
Thus the female duck has evolved a corkscrew pathway towards
fertilization, and it is counterclockwise to the drakes. Thus forceful mating will not result in
fertilization as the pathways do not line up.
If the female duck is willing she will relax her coil and increase the
chances for procreation.
So with examples like this in the animal kingdom, why for so
long have people relied upon the monogamous penguin, or the pigeon to propagate
why humans should practice monogamy? We
cannot pick and choose which animals to mould our relationships or bondings
after. We need to realize that there is
an abundance of variety in the animal kingdom and thus the same within our
species. As more studies are published we
see penguins have been found to not only be monogamous, but sometimes homosexually
monogamous. So even variation exists
among the monogamous species. And the
moral of the story? Sometimes looking to
the animals is not always the best way explain our human sexual desires or
relationship groups unless you are planning to use it as an example of
variation and unlimited possibilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment